Demagoguery
The Answer 2 is related to Demagoguery. "If you want to
calm the hunger of a man for one day, give him a fish
(demagoguery, to lead people, if you want to dominate them, to
tame them as if they were animals). If you want to calm the
hunger of a man for all their life, teach him to fish (pedagogy,
to lead the child, to educate him, it implies compassion, the
genuine will of helping him that is absent in the demagoguery)".
It usually includes also the deceit that the demagogue is the
only supplier possible of what the subordinate needs.
Two Types Of
Emotions
Returning about the emotions, you can distinguish two
types of emotions, those that unite people and those that
separate them (fear, hate, guilt, shame, all expressions or
derivatives of the fear).
The emotions move the world and the incorrect emotions
are moving it in the wrong way, toward the
self-destruction.
Traditionally the power has been based on the emotions
that separate (Divide and you shall rule).
Power is understood as the capacity to cause
suffering.
With that concept of the power you cannot solve the
problems, because you would lose power. Are those problems (war,
terrorism, hunger, misery, unemployment, crime, drugs,
contamination, etc.), that suffering, that makes people to go to
their leaders (the same ones that created those problems) for
protection. Those problems are the source of their power, the
suffering generates the emotions of which that power feeds
himself.
So the problems are not solved but rather they are
increased with counterproductive "solutions", until everything
explodes in some crisis of some
type (a world war, for example).
Counterproductive Solutions
You can easily recognize a counterproductive solution
because it doesn't attack the cause of the problem, only the
effects, the consequences. It is as a defensive reaction, but
without a counteroffensive (a counterattack) or a preventive
action, in such a way that it is never enough, it is always
overloaded, it is always one step behind. It doesn't do nothing
to eliminate the problem, it cohabits with it as if it was
playing an eternal ping pong game, as the other side of the same
coin, it needs it in order to justify its existence. It doesn't
solve nothing and so it worsens the problem. People who doesn't
think very much believes that everything what is done to solve a
problem serves, that everything is useful, that the only
important is that something is being done, no matter what. But it
is not. Some people don't think, they only obey. So they can
deceive them in their face, at full daylight, by making them
believe that they are working really hard to solve the problem
but they can't do it because of misfortune, not for stupidity or
incompetence, or pure wickedness. Perhaps they indeed work hard,
but on the wrong point, miles away from the right point,
knowingly.
So the only thing that they need to do is not to look
for the truth, the true cause of the problem. You can't
effectively combat what you can't understand. If they suspect
that the cause, the truth, is at an address, they go to the
opposite address. Groucho Marx said:
"Politics is the art of looking for the problems, to make a false
diagnostic and applying the wrong remedies". One could change
"looking for the problems" by "creating the problems".
Frequently, those who cause the problem and those who
work on the counterproductive solution are what David Icke calls
"oppo-sames": they simulate to be the opposite, but they are the
same. They are violent, authoritarian extremists, from opposed
extremes, who simulate to fight each other, but they don't strike
each other directly, they strike to innocent people, not
extremists but moderate people, from the opposite side
("enemies") or from their own side ("traitors"), in order to
force to the people to align to one extreme or the other. They
attack the society in a movement of pincers. At the highest level
they are controled by the same leaders, they obey to the same
head, in such a way that whether some day the fight finishes, it
doesn't matter who wins, everybody ends under the same
authoritarian command. They don't strike each other directly
because they know they are the same, they need each other in
order to justify their existence, they fortify each other. So
they take care of each other. They aren't good guys and bad guys,
they are the same, different sides of the same coin, they work
together, coordinated, for our education. Ones push us and the
others pull us, but both in the same direction, toward our
wisdom. (See below)
A classic example of counterproductive solution is to
increase the controls, to give more power to the leaders and less
freedom to the people, to oversee more and more the people. But,
at the same time that you do this, you make sure that you and
your friends have privileges, safe-conducts that allow you to
avoid these controls, to cross them unpunishedly, in such a way
that you continue harming the society in spite of them. Otherwise
it would break the vicious circle and they would no longer be
needed more and more controls. At the end, you have so many laws,
commandments and regulations limiting the people's freedom (but
not your freedom), and they are so complex, that only an expert
can understand them because each rule has its exception, so that
you can apply them arbitrarily, so that the laws are only applied
to powerless people and the exceptions to you and your friends,
without nobody opposes because nobody understands them. Two
thousand years ago the Romans said: "the law is a spider's
web that
catches the flies and it allows to pass the birds." People must
learn to behave by their own choice, their free will, not because
of surveillance or fear of punishment. This forced behavior
wouldn't be truly good, it would disappear when surveillance
fails.
Effective
Solutions
On the other hand, you also can easily recognize an
effective solution because it starts, after a reasonable time, to
improve constantly the situation and it does never stop until the
problem disappears, or almost.
The only thing what you need to do is to oversee the
effects of your solutions. What can't be measured, can't be
controled, in the same way that you can't control the
people what you don't oversee.
A classic example of an effective solution is the
education. This make sense if indeed one lives to learn.
Education is always the best strategy, because if you dig deeply
enough when you look for the root of a problem, you always find
ignorance. And Ho Chi Minh said: "If the tactical is right but
the strategy is wrong, you can win some battles but you'll lose
the war. If the strategy is right but the tactical is wrong, you
can lose some battles but you'll win the war." That is, you can
work to solve a problem, as reacting to an emergency, but you
must never lose of view the strategy of long term.
Ordo Ab
Chaos
If it's so easy to distinguish the effective solutions
from the counterproductive ones, you can only conclude that they
choose the counterproductive ones on purpose.
Lenin said: "So much worse, so much better". To more
chaos, better for his revolution. There is an old Masonic motto,
"Ordo ab Chaos", Order from the Chaos, you create the chaos and
then impose the order, your order, an order to your convenience,
more power for you and less freedom for the people. David Icke
calls this method as "Problem-Reaction-Solution". But your order
can not be good, your solutions can not be effective, because
that would break the vicious circle.
The Method Of The
Python
With each crisis what they create as an excuse, they
obtain more power by reducing still more the freedom of the
people.
Their method resembles that of the python snake (If you
read "The Biggest Secret" from David Icke, this seems very
appropriate. See also in the Bible, the Book of Revelation or
Apocalypse, Chapter 20, Verse 2). Each time that its victim
exhale, the python presses its chest a little more, so the next
time that it inhales it can't expand its chest as before, so it
takes less air each time.
The goal seems to be the total control of the world, a
world dictatorship. The consequence of a power based on the fear
is a government based on the fear, a dictatorship. By reading the
novel 1984, from George Orwell, you can get an idea about how
this society could be.
Sometimes, especially in the economy, it's more like a
pendulum whose displacement from the vertical line diminish more
and more while its energy dissipates, because every time that
they reach a crisis, they stop and they choose an opposite
politics or way of thinking and acting. As a pendulum, they react
to each crisis by stopping and choosing an opposite
counterproductive solution and they go toward the next crisis in
the opposite direction. But they never choose effective
solutions, only counterproductive ones. So, at the end, the
pendulum will stop in its balance point, the vertical line, the
control of the entire world. They call this as Cycles. They are
as the cycles in the graphic of a wave that attenuates as its
energy dissipates and its amplitude is smaller and smaller, until
the line is flat, the control of the world.
What Is All This
About?
All this could sound bizarre, if you dare to call
bizarre to such things as God, the Bible, and religion, because
about those is all this. But indeed, if you read between lines
the last book of the Bible, the Book of Revelation (Apocalypse)
you can find a global dictatorship, a police state, the
government of the Antichrist. And if you read "Pawns in the Game"
from the former British Intelligence's agent William Guy Carr,
and "The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu"
from Maurice Joly, you can find detailed plans to attain this by
means such as world wars and revolutions, as those instructions
in "The Prince" from Niccolò Machiavelli, but more
ambitious. You can't ignore such things as "The Prince", what has
been the Politicians' Bible for 500 years (you probably cannot
understand Politics without reading it), you must take this
seriously.
Forcing the
Apocalypse
It is as if these leaders were trying to follow the Book
of Revelation as a script, as a guide, as if they were trying to
force the coming of this world government.
Who better than the devil and the Antichrist could
personify and symbolize the evil and, for us, the fear, the power
of fear?. That is this all here about.
Some authors say that the concept of Satan is closely
related to the ancient Egyptian god Set (who they say is still
worshipped today inside some secret societies) who tries to stop
the evolution of man by keeping him in the ignorance, according
to the Egyptian Mythology. Some other say that the name comes
from a word what
means deceiver, or from a word what means obstacle, the obstacle
in the man's way toward God, the obstacle what interposes between
man and God. All these are appropriate.
According to the book from William Carr, those who carry
out the plans to conquer the world are worshipers of
Lucifer.
The Letters
From Albert Pike To Giuseppe Mazzini
Surprisingly, the book "Pawns in the Game", from William
Guy Carr, includes the transcription of several letters dated
between 1859 and 1871, from Albert Pike to the Italian
revolutionary Giuseppe Mazzini, which contain detailed plans for
three (3) major world wars, each one followed by one major
revolution. What is more surprising is that two of these wars
(First and Second World Wars, 1914-1919 and 1939-1945) and two of
these revolutions (the Russian and the Chinese ones) happened in
the century XX almost exactly as supposedly they would have been
planned, according to these letters. Each war would plant the
seed of the following one, it would prepare its road. If this is
true, it would still remain the third ones (the Third World War
and the next revolution), so this is extremely serious, so that
it is worthwhile to investigate this seriously.
Some "experts" have hurried too much to dismiss this as
a hoax, hysterically, suspiciously, but these letters would
really fit in the overall context, this make perfect sense. You
should only read the work of Maurice Joly, of the year 1864, to
see how the plans detailed there have been executed since then.
However, Joly doesn't speak of wars, revolutions, nor Satanism,
but about how to control the information, the press, the public
opinion, Politics, the economy, etc., about how to exploit the
debilities of democracy to destroy it and to impose a
dictatorship, what he calls "new order".
Apparently, when Carr's book was written, the year 1958,
this letters were at the British Museum in London, England, and
then, one day, they disappeared, suspiciously. This is most
serious because they were tangible evidence (one of many) of a
conspiracy.
According to the book "The Biggest Secret", from David
Icke, pages 193 to 195, these two men, Pike and Mazzini, were
heavily involved in the planning of the American Civil War, along
with many other known leading Freemasons.
Albert Pike, with the title of Sovereign Grand
Commander, was the head of the Southern Jurisdiction of the
Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in the United States in the second
half of century XIX, while Giuseppe Mazzini was the head of the
Italian Grand Orient Freemasonry, out of which is alleged that
emerged the Mafia.
Pike, author of "Morals And Dogma", an alleged
Luciferian Satanist who believed in the Aryan Master Race,
changed the name of the Knights of the Golden Circle, based in
Cincinnati, Ohio, a crucial Elite group behind the Civil War,
after this organization, funded by the London Freemasonic
bankers, was exposed at the conspiracy trial into Abraham
Lincoln’s death in Indianapolis in June
1865, along with some of the people named there as directly
involved: Lord Palmeston, the British Prime Minister and 33rd
degree Freemason who died in that same year; John Wilkes Booth,
33rd degree Freemason selected by the Knights to kill Lincoln;
Judah P. Benjamin, the voice of the London Freemason bankers who
ordered the assassination; and Jacob Thompson, a former Secretary
for the Interior, who withdrew U$D180,000 from the Bank of
Montreal in Canada to
bankroll the operation.
The new name chosen by Pike for the Knights of the
Golden Circle was Ku ux Klan, or Ku Klux Klan, from the Greek
word kuklos, circle.
The infamous outlaw, Jesse James, a 33rd degree Mason
assigned by Albert Pike to rob banks in the north to further fund
the war, was a Knight of the Golden Circle. Another one was the
Freemason, General P. T. Beauregard, who started the Civil War
with an attack on Fort Sumter in 1861.
Pike's friend and oppo-same, Mazzini, started in 1851 to
establish groups across America which began to campaign against
slavery. The Freemasons used these groups as the cover for the
true motivation behind the Civil War. "Young America" lodges were
organized to do this and their headquarters was at the Cincinnati
Lodge No 133. Their main funding came from the British
Freemasonic banker and Rothschild frontman called George Peabody
and he appointed J. P. Morgan senior to handle the funds in
America. Morgan, was a stooge for Daniel Payseur.
One of the most famous voices against slavery was John
Brown, who became a legend through the song about "John
Brown’s body". Brown, in fact, was a member of a number of
secret societies, including the Freemasons. He became a Master
Mason at the Hudson Lodge No 68 in Hudson, Ohio, on May 11th
1824, and was a member of Mazzini’s Young America. Brown
was funded by the John Jacob Astor family.
The funding for the southern rebellion was arranged
through London Masonic bankers by Caleb Cushing, who was
operating in the north.
Franklin Pierce (the bloodline of George and Barbara
Bush) was elected President in 1853 and Mazzini wrote that:
"almost all his nominations are such as we desired." One of these
"nominations" was the appointment by Pierce of Caleb Cushing as
his Attorney General. Cushing was controlled by English
Freemasonry and connected to the British opium trade to China through
his ship-owner father and his cousin, John Perkins Cushing. Caleb
Cushing wrote extensively against slavery and became the
architect, with Pike, of the Civil War. Oppo-sames.
Freemasons have been also heavily involved in the
American Revolution, the American War of Independence, and every
Latino-american war of independence against Spain.
If this is true, these men have the required experience
to plan wars and
revolutions.
The book "Hitler Won The
War", from the Argentinean economist Walter Graziano, speaks
about a planned future war against China for the year
2010.
According to Carr's book, Pike’s plan was as
simple as it has proved effective. He required that Communism,
Nazism, Political Zionism, and other International movements be
organized and used to foment the three global wars and three
major revolutions. The first world war was to be fought so as to
enable the Illuminati to overthrow the powers of the Tzars in
Russia and turn that country into the stronghold of
Atheistic-Communism. The differences stirred up by agentur of the
Illuminati between the British and German Empires were to be used
to foment this war. After the war ended, Communism was to be
built up and used to destroy other governments and weaken
religions.
Suggestively, Illuminati means "the enlightened ones",
while Lucifer means "the bearer of light".
World War Two, was to be fomented by using the
differences between Fascists and Political Zionists. This war was
to be fought so that Nazism would be destroyed and the power of
Political Zionism increased so that the sovereign state of
Israel could be
established in Palestine. During world war two International
Communism was to be built up until it equaled in strength that of
united Christendom. At this point it was to be contained and kept
in check until required for the final social
cataclysm.
World War Three is to be fomented by using the
differences that the agents of the Illuminati stir up between
Political Zionists and the leaders of the Moslem world. The war
is to be directed in such a manner that Islam (the Arab
World including Mohammedanism) and Political Zionism (including
the State of Israel) will destroy themselves while at the same
time the remaining nations, once more divided against each other
on this issue, will be forced to fight themselves into a state of
complete exhaustion physically, mentally, spiritually and
economically.
On August 15, 1871, Pike told Mazzini that after World
War Three is ended, those who aspire to undisputed world
domination will provoke the greatest social cataclysm the world
has ever known.
This extremely severe chastisement is exactly the same
method as that used to tame an animal, according to "The
Brainwashing Manual", by
Lafayette Ronald Hubbard, synthesis of the Russian textbook on
Psychopolitics, just that instead of applying it to only one
individual, they torture to all the Mankind.
They don't consider to the Man as a spiritual being
having an physical experience, but just an animal with a big
brain, a big intelligence but without heart, without soul. So
they treat Man as an animal to be tamed.
Life is
Energy
They are Materialists. They deny the existence of soul,
indeed they deny the existence of all but material things, all
but what can be perceived by the senses directly or by means of
instruments.
But the senses and instruments are limited. A living
being isn't made only of matter, it has warm, it has movement,
that is to say, it has energy also. The difference between an
alive cell and a dead one that has recently died, it is the
energy. Both have the same matter, the same molecules, the same
atoms, the same substances, but the alive cell has an energy that
lacks in the dead one.
So one can reasonably conclude that this difference
between them, this energy, is life. Life is a form of energy.
Moreover, life is a conscious form of energy. It's conscious
enough to realize that for preserve itself it needs to take
energy from the environment (to feed itself).
Like the soul, the energy of life, named Qi by the
Chinese, Ki by the Japanese and Kundalini by the Hindu, is
indestructible, according to the Principle of Conservation of
Energy, of Physics. So, it exists, and why can't we name it
soul?.
We are talking here about the politic aspect of Power,
but in Physics, Power relates closely to Energy: Power is the
change of Energy divided by the Time. If life is energy, and the
political power is based on suffering, this power changes
negatively the energy of life, because is demonstrated that
suffering shortens life. Dr Candace Pert, of the
Georgetown University, of Washington, D.C., USA, found chemical
connections among the mind and the body that show that it is
impossible to have a thought of any class that doesn't cause
physical changes. This topic, is it treated in the
semi-documental movie on Quantum Physics named "What the Bleep Do
We Know?" (2006). The peptides produced in the Hypothalamus (the
region of the brain investigated by the Dr José Delgado in
his works about mind control), are liberated in the blood flow
when emotions occur, and they couple more and more to specific
receivers in the exterior of the cellular wall, impeding more and
more the access of the
cell to the necessary nutrients, what produces its aging
("negative" emotions).
Isn't
Bizarre?
Many of us have a manipulated, artificial, false,
irrational concept of what is bizarre and what is not. This is
because we don't think enough, we choose to believe in lies, as
it was already stated above. This is because we allow it. We have
allowed millennia of censorship and denial of the truth. To deny
the truth and to censor, to ourselves or to others, is the same.
If we censor, or we allow censorship, that censorship will turn
against us, against our own freedom. Censorship leads to
dictatorship. Nobody lives happy in a dictatorship, everybody
lives with fear, so even those who work for the dictatorship are
betrayed by it, because it's based on lies.
Incredible isn't equal to false. Extraordinary isn't
impossible. Unusual isn't unreal.
Many times we discover that what we've thought true is
false, and vice versa. Those times, reality is usually stranger
than fiction because reality is not as they try to make us
believe.
Surely, there is not nothing so false as the official
version of the things (official history, official news, official
"science"). It should not be this way, but it is, sadly, because
we have allowed it. Mark Twain said: "When your opinion coincides
with that of the majority, it's time to reconsider
it".
Especially we have allowed ourselves to be deceived in
momentous, vital questions, that concern to our survival like
species, because they concern to both, our origin and our
destiny, those what have been reviled and ridiculed with such
appellatives as Supernatural or Paranormal, Mystic, Mythology,
Esoteric and Occult, those what taught, secretly, the Invisible
College of Oxford. These are questions about which the
"scientists" don't want to arrive to the truth, but maintaining
the status quo, to perpetuate the ignorance, in such a way that
they will destroy all evidence presented to them and then they
will say "there are not evidences" (there is not worse blind man
that the one that doesn't want to see). They include such things
as Angels and Extraterrestrials (they could be the same with
different names, as says Zecharia Sitchin, Giorgio Bongiovanni,
and many others), Ghosts, Reincarnation or Life After Death, God
and Religion, Metaphysics (partly known now as Quantum Physics or
Quantum Mechanics), Prophecies, Dowsing, Divination, Magic,
Witchcraft, Satanism, and Conspiracy Theories.
What Are
They Doing Right Now?
Seemingly, since half century ago they have been
developing, secretly, a technology to track the people, a
microchip that would also allow to control the emotions of the
people in those that are implanted, at least since the Spanish
doctor's works, Dr. Jose Manuel Rodriguez Delgado, in the decade
of 1950, inventor of the stimoceiver and author of the book
"Physical Control Of The Mind: Toward to Psychocivilized
Society", editorial Harper & Row, NY, 1969, available,
partly, in http://www.angelfire.com/or/mctrl/delgado.htm.
Some authors say that this microchip would be the Apocalypse's
Mark of the Beast.
Nothing that it is good and decent would be allowed in a
society like this, because the positive emotions that it would
generate would not fit in it.
If the power is based on emotions and if was unavoidable
that all civilizations reach in some point of its development a
such technology that allows it such an absolute power that it
even allows it to control the population's emotions, what
emotions would be allowed and which not?.
The answer to that question will depend on its degree of
moral and
spiritual evolution, since that determines the use that will be
given to that technology. The technology is a tool, it isn't good
neither bad by itself, that depends of who it uses it and for
what.
The advances in an area of the knowledge and the human
activity depend on the progress in other areas. We are all
interdependent. Everything is related to everything else, and a
backwardness in the moral or spiritual aspect brakes our
development in the other areas (even the technology) in such a
way that it makes to be in danger our own survival like species,
when diminishing our capacity to survive an eventual (to very
long term, unavoidable) planetary catastrophe. But this is also
another topic.
That society, as the one described in 1984, would be the
expression of the bad side of all the things because in it there
isn't anything good and true, and it would be based on two main
pillars: the fear and the lie. Both can be combatted efficiently
with education.
Levels Of The
Human Necessities (Human Rights)
The suffering is generated by preventing the people to
satisfy their necessities.
In 1984 the war is used to maintain people in the
misery, by destroying the fruit of its work (the war is
destructive, obviously), and the misery is used to maintain the
inequality, and the inequality is used to maintain the power. The
power is the ultimate goal of the governing class, not a means to
accomplish something, not even benefits, because although they
have more privileges than the majority, all they live worse every
time, as the time passes. According to the book (it is
reasonable), technical progress stops (as it was already said,
that threatens the survival of the human species). It is only the
power for the power, without any other reason.
From 1984 one can deduct that people are maintained in
the misery so that they only worry to survive each day and be not
interested in more momentous matters, all they related ones to
each other and with our individual and collective survival: the
future, the politics, the morality, the religion and the
spirituality, the wisdom, the art (the necessity of expression),
etc.
They know that before worrying about those high matters,
people must satisfy their more basic necessities, so they make
all the effort so that they are not able to make it.
The necessities (sometimes they are called Human Rights)
of the people can be divided in levels, such that, before
somebody worries about the superior levels, he / she should have
satisfied the inferior ones, at least partly. It is a simple
matter of priorities.
The lower levels are those what link us to the Earth, to
the physical world, to the mortal biological life. The upper last
levels are those what link us to the God, to the Universe, to
Heaven, to the eternal life.
Level 1
The first level is that of the basic necessities for
life (the body), for the biological survival, to continue
breathing: air (obvious), water, food, clothes, housing, security
(to maintain the physical integrity), etc. This is what keeps us
alive.
It is hardly in this level that they seek to maintain
people, by trying to make that they cannot satisfy these
necessities fully, so that they hardly survive enough to serve to
the governing class, but not more.
But to survive is not to live. To survive is hardly to
breathe. To live is to enjoy. The World Health Organization
simply defines that state as Health, full psychophysical
health.
In fact, one could believe that the Buddhists say that
to breathe and to enjoy life should be synonymous, and that the
secret of the happiness is to be satisfied with very little, to
the degree of being satisfied just with to breathe, in a state of
grace, of ecstasy, of peaceful contemplation, marveling in each
opportunity, as a little child, with the beauty of the world, as
if this was discovered for the first time, being happy and
grateful just by being alive and emptying the mind of all desire
and emotion (emotions again, in the Spanish language there isn't
great difference between the definition of desire and that of
emotion). Of course, this requires of a lot of practice and some
minimum conditions (a minimum of food, of water, of clothes,
etc.).
But, for most of us, to live requires of satisfying
other necessities.
Level 2
The following level to satisfy are the sexual
necessities (the couple). This give us a reason to live. So we
have all type of obstacles to impede that they be satisfied, as
much as it be possible without it was evident. We have the false
morality, the false dogmas of the false religion, etc. If you
think it, you realize this.
We say that "not only of bread the Man lives", or like
the French say, "eat, drink and be happy, because tomorrow we
will die." With that "be happy", or when one eats up in excess or
there are dysfunctions of the feeding (obesity, bulimia,
anorexia,
etc.), or when what one drinks is not to calm the thirst of the
level 1, for example alcohol, we
speak of necessities of level 2 and superior. All the addictions
could be, mostly or completely, inferior substitutes of a
satisfactory sexuality.
By the way, Michel Foucault said:
"When that private becomes public, the public thing becomes
private." When the attention is focused in the private affairs of
people, when what everybody oversee are the private behaviors,
the public affairs get lost of view, they stop to oversee the
government, they lose the control on what the Big Brother is
doing. To oversee private behaviors is a typical
counterproductive solution.
Level 3
The third level is that of the affective necessities
(the family). This give us more reasons, reasons to sustain our
own life to be able to sustain others. So all the effort is made
to separate people, to separate the brothers, to the friends, to
the parents of the children, etc. Negative emotions are
generated. To distinguish them in function of the people's union
or separation, we can call them negative to those that separate
to the people (different forms of the fear: fear itself, hate,
guilt, shame, etc.) and positive to those that unite them
(different forms of the love: romantic, filial, fraternal love,
friendship, charity, compassion, etc.). In fact, we cannot say
that an emotion is negative. It has an useful function: to alert
that there is a problem.
Level 4
The fourth level could be the necessity to serve (the
community), of helping the neighbor, the social need of being
accepted in the society, of fitting in it, of belonging to it,
the vocation of service, the charity, what corresponds to the
chakra of the heart. This is the boiling surface, the barrier,
the limit that you need to have enough energy to overcome in
order to get eternal life. So that whenever it is possible they
try to deny to the people their place in the world, to exclude
them, to discriminate against them.
Level 5
The fifth level would be the necessity of expression, of
creating art, of teaching what has been learned, of saying, what
corresponds to the chakra of the throat. This is where you live
to inspire to others. So they censure and they impose silence and
secrecy.
Level 6
The sixth level would be the necessity to learn, of
seeing, of knowing, of being educated, what corresponds to the
chakra of the center of the forehead or of the third eye. So they
combat the education to try to perpetuate the
ignorance.
Why the need to teach is lower than (precedes) the need
to learn?. Would not it maybe be logical that it was on the
contrary, that you first learn and later do teach?. Because, when
you teach, your unconscious, your immortal soul, assimilate, it
memorizes, it incorporates, what it learned, in such a way that
is easier for it to conserve it when you die, is easier for you
to carry it with you to a new life when you reincarnate, is
easier for your unconscious to remind it. If you cannot remember,
you cannot learn and that is the reason of your existence. When
you teach something, you really think a lot about that, you can
dream of that, what indicates that your unconscious learns it. It
is as when one memorizes better something when one writes it
down. It is only when you teach that you are really ready to
learn more, to learn new things or to learn old things
better.
Level 7
The seventh level would be the necessity to come closer
to God, or the Universal Intelligence, or as you want to call
Him, of communion, of religion, of some spiritual practice, what
corresponds to the chakra of the crown. Etcetera.
Toward the
Pathocracy
Pathocracy (from the Greek pathos: illness, and kratos:
government) is the government of the ill people, the government
of the insane people, according to the Polish researcher Andrew
M. Lobaczewski in his book "Politic Ponerology". Ponerology (from
the Greek poneros: evil, and logos: study) is the study of evil.
Pathocracy is the result of a process of Ponerization of the
society, de hysterization of the society. Note that the concept
of hysteria has been always related to a deficient sexuality, so
this validates the concept of Orgonomy, from Wilhelm Reich
(1897-1957), disciple of Sigmund Freud.
Examples of Pathocracy are the Nazi Germany of Adolf Hitler and
the Soviet Union of Joseph Stalin.
These leaders that make an effort so that people cannot
satisfy their necessities are, in fact, psychopaths, since they
are unable to feel compassion for those of their own species, as
if they do not consider themselves part of it. Compassion is what
make us humans. For that reason one could think that they are not
totally human in the sense that we give to the word human (that
opposite to inhuman). They can be human on the outside, but not
completely human on the inside. Their law is the Law of the
Strongest, the Law of the Jungle, the law of the animals. As
animals, they flee from the stronger but they attack the weaker.
For us, humans, that is Cowardice by definition. They can have a
totally human physical body, but inside it a divided mind, double
or multiple (in 1984 Doublethink), partly not human, a possessed
mind (MPD, Multiple Personality Disorder, or DID Dissociative
Identity Disorder, different, modern, psychological names for the
same thing, the ancient concept of demonic possession of the
faith, a spiritual disease, in definitive,
psychopaths).
They have a perspective of the life that is animal and
Darwinist, based on the wildest competition, not in the
collaboration, the cooperation and the solidarity. It is the
survival of the fittest, not the survival of the wisest. An
example of this are Adam Smith's
economic theories that are still the paradigm of the economy,
although the mathematical genius, and Nobel Prize, John Nash
demonstrated mathematically half century ago they are mistaken,
that is possible to obtain a better society for everyone by means
of the cooperation, a fact that has been maintained neatly
outside of the academic scope in economy, maintained in secret as
much as it is possible. (See the book "Hitler won the war", of
the Argentinean economist Walter Graziano).
Then, seeing the life as a competition, they think that
as worse it is for the neighbor, so much better for them, and
they believe that the neighbor thinks the same of them, they see
the neighbor as a reflection from themselves. For that reason,
they fear the neighbor. The fear is the emotion that dominates
them. Perhaps they have been educated to fear since they were
children (perhaps even since before being born), by means of
tortures and verbal, physical, sexual and psychological abuse, to
dominate them, to enslave them, to transform them into
marionettes, because the strings that move them are made of fear.
This is what Fritz Springmeier and Cisco Wheeler say in their
books "The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable
Total Mind Controlled Slave" and "Deeper Insights into the
Illuminati Formula", where they describe a method of mind control
much older, perhaps millennial, and much more sophisticated that
the Brainwashing Manual of Hubbard.
They provide deliberately enormous suffering to big
fringes of the population for money and for power.
They sacrifice the neighbor, literally, in all the
meaning of the word sacrifice, specially the religious one. It
works for them. They get what they wish in exchange for their
offering of human blood. They are rewarded for spilling people's
blood in wars, crime, terrorism, etc. Harm is rewarded. Money is
at harm's service. Look at the economy. There are, everywhere,
harmful activities that are very profitable, many of them
legal.
At the same time that they provide suffering to the
people, they are providing them, unconsciously, an educational
experience.
All This Is About Our
Education
Some authors say that life is a learning process, in
fact through many lives (reincarnation).
One lives to learn and, basically, there are two ways to
do it: understanding what it is being tried to teach us
(metaphysics, compassion, wisdom) or experiencing in flesh and
blood the consequences of not doing it (the already mentioned
suffering). It is our election, our free will.
Everything could be better, if there were not people
dedicated to harm to other people for money or for power, or
simply to satisfy their own necessities. However, everything is
exactly as it must be so that we learn of the consequences of our
errors. It is necessary that everything be as it is. Indeed,
there aren't good guys and bad guys, angels and demons, heroes
and villains. They are all actors playing a role, as we are,
everyone. There can't be an hero without a villain. They are the
same, different sides of the same coin, they work together,
coordinated, for our education. Ones push us and the others pull
us, but both in the same direction, toward our wisdom.
All what happens in our life, individually or
collectively, is consequence of our previous decisions. Sometimes
that is called karma. What we
sow is what we harvest. What we give comes back to us as a
boomerang, but amplified, multiplied.
Each one chooses what he or she wants to believe, as
well as he / she chooses what wants to think, how he / she wants
to feel and about what he / she wants to be informed or to learn.
And he / she will endure the consequences of their election,
either good or not.
What To
Do
From the reading of this text it should be obvious that
we first need to educate ourselves, we need to learn about those
momentous questions, those about which we have been kept ignorant
so long, because this matters are at the origin of all the
problems what threaten our individual and collective
survival.
In second place, we must be responsible. We must not
surrender to fear. Fear doesn't allow to think. It triggers
automatic, instinctive behaviors. Fear transform us in animals.
That is what they want, to stop our evolution. We must think, to
think more, to think better.
We must reason. We must choose better, more carefully,
what to believe. We must not believe, automatically, all what
says some authority, some "reliable" source. We must analyze the
information, not to prejudge the source.
We must never censure, nor to allow censorship. If we
are editors, publishers, or something like that, we must reserve
a special section or to put a warning for challenged sources and
controversial information, but not censure them, so that the
readers or viewers can read or see this information and to judge
it by themselves, by filtering it by their own common sense,
while they are aware of its character of challenged or
controversial. If we are only readers or viewers, we must demand
that this be done. There must be not taboo sources and subjects.
We can't censure something true just because is used as a kind of
flag by some extremist group.
We must not allow the abuse of Copyright for censorship.
By example, in an article, a link to a web page what violate some
Copyrights is not itself (the link) a violation of Copyright. The
author of the article is not responsible for the contents of the
pages addressed by the links in the article. A link to a web page
is not an unauthorized reproduction of Copyrighted material. You
can easily recognize some abuses of Copyright when some people
challenge or disqualify a source with any excuse, any bad label,
but then they are the first ones in claiming for the defense of
that source's Copyright. It's a little contradictory
(Doublethink). They are obviously trying to prevent the access of other
people to that source's material, censuring it under the guise of
"Copyright protection".
We must always keep ourselves in search of the truth. If
we know that any source is disqualified with any excuse, with any
bad label, we should try to know what it say to filter this by
our own common sense, not to allow that who disqualify that
source, by putting those label to it, to think for us, to decide
which information can we read and which not. We must be open to
all sources and trust in our own common sense, not other's
one.
We must never tolerate lies and contradictions,
specially in those momentous questions, specially in public
affairs, specially from our leaders and authorities.
We must defend freedom and the right to
privacy.
We must oversee our leaders and their decisions, we must
make sure that they are motivated by positive emotions, by
compassion, that is that they are truly interested in solving the
people's problems, and that their solutions reflect this by
having measurable positive effects, that is that they are not
based on the criterion "so worse, so better". We must make sure
that the causes of the problems are investigated, and that the
solutions that are applied really act on them. We must make sure
that they understand well the causes of the problems, otherwise
they would be as blind boxers throwing blows in the darkness. We
must demand that these causes be well explained to us,
satisfactorily.
Sources
- "The Prince" (1513) from Niccolò
Machiavelli. - "The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and
Montesquieu" (1864) from Maurice Joly. - "1984" (1949), from George Orwell.
- "" (1955), by Lafayette
Ronald Hubbard. - "Pawns
in the Game" (1958) from William Guy
Carr. - "Physical
Control Of The Mind: Toward to Psychocivilized
Society", (1969), editorial Harper & Row,
NY, from Dr. Jose Manuel Rodriguez Delgado. - "Discipline and Punish" (1975) from Michel Foucault.
- "Politic
Ponerology" (1984) from Andrew M.
Lobaczewski - "I
am Me. I am Free" (1996) and "The
Biggest Secret" (1999) from David
Icke. - "Hitler won the war" (2003) of Walter
Graziano.
Autor:
Roberto Cruz
 Página anterior | Volver al principio del trabajo | Página siguiente  |